Updated On: September 12, 2021
Review the schedule and content for each onsite session.
Introductory Sessions
March 31, 2020
The session with the BOB focused on introducing the foundational tools included Cloud & Box and the Future Team Journey. As an introductory session, Covid-19 had seriously impacted the church as many churches had stopped meeting for 2-3 Sundays gathered at this time.
The GOT meeting started with a devotional and the moved to clarifying a convergence moment in Free Methodism with the opportunity to ask, “Who are we?” and “Where are we going?” Will shared about his life work with clarity and vision and discussed early learning with Covid-19.
We introduced an immediate planning tools and a small book called Innovating Discipleship to help denominational and church leaders during this disruption. The primary time was dedicated to training with the Cloud & Box for both GOT and the BOA with time for dialogue. Our schedule for the week was as as follows:
Tuesday, March 31
11:00a – 5:00p processing with the Board of Bishops
7:00 – 9:00p presentation to the Global Overseers Team (renamed SLT or “SaLT” Superintendent Leadership Team
Friday, April 3
1:30 – 2:30p presentation to the National Board of Administration (shorter version of the GOT presentation)
Session 1
April 24, 2020
During the first session after the kick-off week the discussion started discussing the challenging days of leading with Covid-19. (Bishop’s word, Facebook live events) Will asked several questions to get an orientation to how the BOB is working together functionally, logistically and relationally.
We spent a significant amount of time training on the Value Map. This brought us to a dedicated discussion on the importance of and loss of Idealogical Value.
In terms of continued orientation we discussed:
Session 2
May 8, 2020
In session two we built on the Cloud & Box and the Value Map with the 5 Levels of Engagement. As we discussed this tool we acknowledged that we would relabel the levels for Free Methodism.
In addition, we discussed logistics toward the idea of clarifying how decisions in the Denominee process would be made:
We discussed a significant checkpoint in October where a roadmap could be communicated more broadly.
During this meeting Will gave the BOB the assignment for the Founding Charism via email.
Session 3
May 29, 2020
We dedicated this day to working on the Founding Charism tool specifically working through the Tribal Identity process work. The assignment was as follows:
Make a long list of the possible ideas for our top distinctives as a faith tribe. Consider the questions:
Refine the list to a top five using the filtering questions below:
Session 4
June 2, 2020
We dedicated this day to working on the Founding Charism tool specifically working through the Tribal Identity process work.
We sent considerable time discussing the racial crisis in our country as well as praying for the family needs of the bishops.
Session 5
June 29, 2020
We dedicated this day to working on the Founding Charism tool specifically working through the Tribal Identity process work.
These two days flowed very quickly as we framed our discussion by two priorities: 1) What are the immediate priorities and decisions in the week following? and 2) What are the continued foundational “paradigm tools” that we need to explore?
The easiest way to follow the flow of content is to review the flip chart pictures downloadable at the button to the left. The following are highlight bullets from the time:
MattWhitehead – 26 Motivating Inspirer
KeithCowart – 23 Motivating Director (Classic)
LindaAdams – 47 Helping Inspirer (Accommodating)
On this zoom call we spent a majority of out time designing our week of October 4th-9th and holding our ground to maximize the experience virtually. The schedule is downloadable below.
Free Methodist Oct. 4-9 Schedule
We did debrief the 2-day onsite in Indianapolis and discussed the Future Church Cohorts that will be launching on Sept. 14th.
We converged in St Louis for session #8 and kicked off at 11:00 on Sunday morning. We started with an expectation list that included spending time on team design for the BOB.
The first movement was spending time on the “ability circle” of the Younique special calling toolbox. Attached you have a chapter from the book on Ability and a PDF fillable worksheet to record date from each tool that we discussed.
Younique Book Chapter 16 on Ability
During the ability coaching we did spend time considering the LifeScore of the Health, Love, Work, Play storylines and Psalms spirituality. We share about a where we are thriving, surviving and reviving.
In the afternoon we continued our work on our “Profound Passions” and landed on the top level articulation of five tribal identity values.
NEXT STEP >> Keith will be bringing a paragraph of each value to our next meeting on Sept. 24-25th.
We concluded the first day with Mexican food at Nixta!
The next day was dedicated to responding to the Structure and Effectiveness Task Force which we delivered in a 2-1/2 hour zoom call.
We ended with framing a 2020-2021 integrated process where we can design, validate and begin to implement the new Vision Frame and Next Step OS for our denomination.
Key calendaring actions include:
We covered many topics during this two days together. The list below is a review of our most important deliverables first and then continues to cover training and perspective topics that were covered through a Q & A style with Will.
Most of our three days was given to walking the SLT through the Denominee paradigm tools. We spent a great deal of time planning a meaningful and interactive virtual retreat and felt like we had strong results with many positive comments following about the meeting itself. Bishop Matt commented that on superintendent said it was the best denominational meeting of this kind that he had ever experienced.
Afterwards we spent most of our time discussing structure including ongoing conversations on the matrix structure. We discussed the differences in kinds of coaching and consulting. We continued work on designing the pacesetters gathering.
Our primary focus in this session was two fold as we met in Atlanta. We landed the “Free Methodist Way”. We also introduced the Mission Development Tool as a thinking step that helps us clarify with precision your “One Thing”. Using two-word technology, we brainstormed brainstormed a large list of possible two-word possibilities before narrowing down to the reason the Box exists.
It was fun to host in Houston!!
In this session, we worked through the Pace Setters Gathering Agenda, the ELT Makeup and talked about how to use Vision Frame. Our primary progress was made around filling out the Mission Development tool, including landing the One Thing and identifying four inputs and outputs.
This thinking step sets us up for building out the the Vision Frame, which will inform not only how we think but how we lead into the future.
In this session, we moved from the Mission Development Tool to completing the first draft of the Vision Frame for the “Box”. FM_vision_frame_draft
Session 14 – Box Vision Frame Draft 2
Monday, May 17th 2021
In this session we continued to refine and update the “Box Vision Frame”; specifically adding new strategy revolving around a next step approach.
Free Methodist Vision Frame v2.o
—There is skepticism about top-down programs but expectation to lead
—There is not hope for our denomination if every conference has their own operating system
—What keeps the denomination from utilizing “in network” strengths? The “expert ego” of the superintendent
—”We are called to upset the system of the FMC”
—If the operating system does not release APEST, it will not yield biblically functioning conferences
—(From Will speaking to Matt, Linda and Keith): You are possibilitarians that must initiate the change mechanism. You cannot lead the change needed within the existing mechanisms.
—The possibility that the there bishops are all primary apostolic with different secondaries (Keith – teaching apostle, Matt – shepherding apostle, Linda – prophetic apostle)
—We may need an affiliation coach (to help UMC churches join)
—The name meaning exercise brought a sense of connection and significance
—We need to create and communicate our decision-making process (including “design directives” to the S&E task force)
—The Covid disruption has caused us to use language about the deconstruction and difficulty for church leaders; the use of “disorientation” in the Psalms teaching may help us interpret
—The idea that bishops may have radically different responsibilities yet maintain the plurality of leadership
—We must “fix the software before the hardware” (How we thinking before structure, buildings, etc.)
—The ELT/XLT team idea really represents and fixes a true execution gap
—Gift and passion based responsibilities for the BOB is now clearer and made possible
—The peloton image for leading leaders
—We need to declare the bad news of the current state of decline in the USA
—We have “system issues” that cloud a bit our “people issues” (It’s easy to blame people when it may be a system that is broken)
—The Free Methodist Way is working; it is bringing ideological clarity and keeping the main thing the main thing
—Tali affirmed the XLT structure as a co-creative culture-shaping step forward
—Multiplication is coming through clear with a 3X emphasis; FM way, mission and mission measures
—Phoenix SLT in Spring of 2021 was a tipping point of receptivity
—Global leaders can benefit from the “Box’s Vision Frame”, FM Way and Kingdom Charism tools.
Understand
We grasp our identity as the “box” and how that frames our relationship to the “cloud” that created us.
Assess
We have come to a shared understanding of specific ways we (the box) have tried leading the cloud and compared it to what the cloud made us to do.
Apply
We are acting on a robust strategy for becoming the box the cloud would create today if it started from scratch.
Understand
We can define and tell the difference between relational value, functional value, and ideological value, and we can explain the lines of short-term sustainability and long-term viability.
Assess
We have thoroughly evaluated our activities as to the kind of value each of them offers the cloud, and from this we have assessed our short-term sustainability and long-term viability.
Apply
We are actively retooling our activities to increase the value we provide at the point of greatest need according to our assessment of our short-term sustainability and long-term viability.
Understand
We can define each level of engagement as a categorization of how some of our churches relate to us, and we can explain its relationship to the three kinds of value we provide.
Assess
We have a document or spreadsheet that classifies all our churches by level of engagement according to our best, shared understanding.
Apply
We have identified the churches at each level of engagement with the most promise for going to the next level, and we consistently act strategically to invite them to that level.
Understand
We understand how the Founding Charism tool depicts a filter of historical and organizational influences on our box.
Assess
We have arrived at a robust, shared understanding of what we have inherited from each layer of our Founding Charism, good and bad, and how each one influences what we do and how we do it.
Apply
We have creatively reappropriated and rearticulated the significance of our Founding Charism for today’s cloud, and we consistently communicate ideological value accordingly.
Understand
We have a strong grasp of the characteristics of programs and organizations at each of the four quadrants of the Life Cycle.
Assess
We have collaboratively and objectively plotted where every program and event we run falls on the Life Cycle.
Apply
We are acting on strategic decisions to revitalize programs and events on the back side of the Life Cycle or to shift resources away from them to front-side programs and events.
Understand
We can describe the characteristics of a church of each category and can tell the differences between one category and another.
Assess
We have a document or spreadsheet that classifies all our churches by smart segmentation according to our best, shared understanding.
Apply
We consistently offer next-step resources, advice, events, and programs to our churches tailored appropriately to their Smart Segmentation level.
Understand
We can explain why churches of different attendance sizes have different organizational cultures and can name and describe the characteristics of each major size range.
Assess
We have a document or spreadsheet that classifies all our churches by size culture according to our best, shared understanding.
Apply
We consistently offer next-step resources, advice, events, and programs to our churches tailored appropriately to their size culture.
Understand
We understand the fixed distance principle and the distribution of L1 through L5 churches among the top 20 percent and the bottom 80 percent.
Assess
We have taken an objective, data-based evaluation of how much staff time and attention in the recent past has been devoted to L1, L2 and L3 churches versus L4 and L5 churches.
Apply
We have established practical staff guidelines for devoting 80 percent of our energy to L1, L2, and L3 churches, and we are held accountable to that standard.
Understand
We understand and can define the three methods by which we (the box) can help churches in the cloud take their next step.
Assess
We have thorough, objective lists of resources in the cloud, expertise in the box, and providers in the denomination and the general market that are prepared to respond today if we call on them for help.
Apply
We have expanded our suite of resources in the cloud, in the box, and outside our network to offer a useful next step to every church in our cloud, whatever its issue.
Size | L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
800+ | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
400-800 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
200-400 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
100-200 | 65 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0-100 | 347 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
For the first nine months of the journey we had regular conversations about BOB roles and functioning. Continuing to redesign how BOB functions in light of the paradigm is project one
For the first 12 months of the journey we had regular conversations about the development of the XLT as an important mechanism to bridge an execution gap. Designing and building this team based on the paradigm tools is project two.